ImageJ vs. wound measurement app for small wounds - Sharun et al.
imito AG
Agende uma demonstração
iconHamburger
icon-cross
Produtos
imitoWound app icon
imitoWound
Documentação de feridas e medição de feridas com IA
WoundGenius app (new imitoMeasure) icon
WoundGenius
O novo padrão na avaliação de feridas
imitoCam app icon
imitoCam
O novo padrão na avaliação de feridas
imitoScan App Icon
imitoScan
Aplicativo de digitalização de documentos de pacientes

Áreas de uso
Para diretores de enfermagem
Para gestores de hospitais

Pesquisa
Sobre Nós
Referências e parceiros
Quem somos
Nossa história
Eventos
Carreiras

Recursos
Estudos científicos
Blog
Newsletter

Save the date and meet us at DMEA in Berlin April 21-23! Book your appointment with us here.

imito AG
Agende uma demonstração
iconHamburger
ImageJ vs. wound measurement app for small wounds - Sharun et al.
24 de abril de 20251 min. para ler
ImageJ vs. wound measurement app for small wounds - Sharun et al.

291 rabbit wounds were measured using (a) imitoMeasure as a smartphone-based wound measurement tool, and (b) acetate tracing as the traditional manual wound measurement method. Wound measurements were then compared against (c) ImageJ as the established digital wound measurement method.

Wound measurement and wound research and with imito

The authors Sharun et al. conclude that imitoMeasure consistently showed a higher level of agreement with ImageJ, particularly in small and intermediate wounds. imitoMeasure also proved to be the quickest method across all wound sizes, whereas wound tracing required the longest processing time.

👉 Read the full study here

imito AG
Ⓒ imito AG 2016–2026