Measuring wound size reduction for octenidine gel vs. povidone-iodine dressing
imito AG
Planifier une démo
iconHamburger
🇬🇧🇩🇪🇫🇷🇧🇷icon-cross
Produits
imitoCam app icon
imitoCam
Documentation médicale photo et vidéo
imitoWound app icon
imitoWound
Documentation et mesure des plaies avec l'IA
imitoScan app icon
imitoScan
Scanner les documents des patients
imitoMeasure app icon
imitoMeasure
Mesure de la plaie à l'essai

Cas d'utilisation
Photo et vidéo-documentation médicale
Obtenir une seconde opinion
Recherche et enseignement
Numériser des documents
Intégration DPI, DMS et PACS
Documentation de plaie

Recherche
Société
Références et partenaires
A propos d'imito
Notre histoire
Évènements
Offres d’emploi

Ressources
Études scientifiques
Actualités
Revue de presse
Documents pour médias

imito AG
Planifier une démo
iconHamburger
Measuring wound size reduction for octenidine gel vs. povidone-iodine dressing
1 septembre 20201 min à lire
Measuring wound size reduction for octenidine gel vs. povidone-iodine dressing

80 diabetic patients received one of the 2 treatments for their foot ulcers for 14 days. Wound healing was assessed by calculating the mean percentage reduction in ulcer area. Octenidine wound gel showed a superior mean reduction of 25.5%, while povidone-iodine dressing showed a reduction of 14.5%.

Octenidine has been known as an antiseptic for the past 20 years; however, few clinical studies have evaluated its advantages. In this study, both groups received treatment once daily, and wound sizes were measured on days 0, 7, and 14.

imito AG
Ⓒ imito AG 2016–2025